User talk:TropicalCoder

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:440Hz0dB10secs16bitsDithered wav.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:440Hz0dB10secs16bitsNoDithering wav.png. The copy called Image:440Hz0dB10secs16bitsNoDithering wav.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:440Hz0dB10secs16bitsNoDithering_wav.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:440Hz0dB10secs16bitsNoDithering_wav.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 17:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:440Hz0dB10secs16bitsDithered wav.png

Thanks for uploading Image:440Hz0dB10secs16bitsDithered wav.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WhyNotAskMe.org

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WhyNotAskMe.org, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Minor and not-so-minor edits

Hi TropicalCoder! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Peter Navarro that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]