User talk:Trudant

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Technology and Science Press (NTS Press) (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.ntspress.com/about/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:National Technology and Science Press (NTS Press) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk 18:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Trudant, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /tlk 18:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Technology and Science Press (NTS Press) (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This is an encyclopedia, and articles must be "timeless" - therefore the "current publications" section must be deleted. If there are suitable sources, one could have a section for a selection of publications from the history of the press. Second, none of the press's publications nor the press web site can be used as references. WP articles must be entirely sourced to third-party, independent reliable sources, such as newspaper and journal articles. Thirdly, there are some weird formatting problems here, probably from the text having been copied from other sources. It may be necessary to re-write rather than copy/paste.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Technology and Science Press (NTS Press) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 03:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:National Technology and Science Press (NTS Press) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:National Technology and Science Press (NTS Press), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]