User talk:Trusttgemedia

July 2018

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Roe v. Wade (film)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tks, Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roe v. Wade (film). Please stop linking the name to that article. It is being considered for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathy Allyn and I doubt it will ever see the light of day. Also, IMDb is not considered a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDB since it's a user-generated website and there's no professional editorial control. Another disruptive editing from you will constitute vandalism and will result in your (and your alternate account Drsopher) being blocked from editing for sockpuppetry Tks, Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]