User talk:Truthbetold91

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to B Howard, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I apologize I am new to editing on Wikipedia. I will leave explanations as to why I have edited from now on. Truthbetold91 (talk) 20:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at B Howard. Itgemgirl1 ❯❯❯ talk 19:14, 26 Aug 2020 (UTC) Itgemgirl1 (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“ Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism.” Truthbetold91 (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at B Howard, you may be blocked from editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at B Howard. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:14, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page was misleading and was updated with accurate information including sources. Truthbetold91 (talk) 19:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at B Howard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kb03 (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 00:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it apparently is vandalism to change the contents of the page to what is actually said in the article cited on said page. How malicious of me. Truthbetold91 (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked for edit warring, not vandalism. Please see WP:EW. --RegentsPark (comment) 21:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]