User talk:Truthforsocialgood

your edit to the Victorinox page

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Victorinox. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Windward1 (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

It is based on the facts. See the references attached. You must be a paid writer for Victorinox. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

The content was improved by posting exactly the same statements issued by The United Nations WIPO and The Japan Times. It is important to raise awareness for social good. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 17:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Victorinox, you may be blocked from editing. I have read the sources you provided. Most of your claims are not supported therein. You will need to find better ones that actually state the claims made. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a campaign platform or soapbox Windward1 (talk) 18:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

You are a paid writer for Victorinox. The page if full of advertising content with no reference articles and you do not delete any. Our content was copied and pasted directly from The United Nations WIPO which is a fair ruling in good faith. You have no rights to block by siding the advertiser you are being paid which is violation of Wikipedia policy. Please put back the content as per facts issued by The United Nations WIPO ruling. You deleted The Japan Times article which was also copied and pasted from the actual content siding both sides. Your assumption of "vandalise" is incorrect and you should be reported to Wikipedia as paid writer for Victorinox. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Windward1's edit history shows hundreds of edits streching back over fifteen years on a wide variety of subjects, only the latest few edits having anything to do with this topic. Please stop with your evidence-free accusations of other editors. _signed, Willondon (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Without a subscription, I couldn't check for copyright violations, but if you truly have been copy-and-pasting from other sources, you need to stop. Please read Wikipedia:Copyright#Using copyrighted work from others to understand how important it is, for legal and other reasons, to not host material that is protected under a copyright. _signed, Willondon (talk) 19:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop edit-warring your change back into the article, and make your case on Talk:Victorinox. _signed, Willondon (talk) 19:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

I know you are a paid writer by Victorinox, but this is not your page. This is a public page for social good. If you are obsessed with this page's edits, you should focus on advertising content with no reference links which is most of the page. These should be fixed first. Our content of Victorinox Abuse Case is for social good supporting the female victims of violence, ruled by the United Nations WIPO. If you have a problem against the social good, but not touching the advertising content of Victorinox page, you are violating the Wikipedia policy. The purpose of Wikipedia is to raise awareness of facts based on the case rulings in good faith. Victorinox's previous page was a fully paid advertisement while the company is violently abusing females and evicting 100 children in the middle of academic year. This is the first case of children evicted from education in the history and the most headlined news in Japan. You cannot delete and cover up with paid advertisement of corporations. You must be an editor in good faith for social good. Your claim is a threat to the writers based on facts for social contribution which is what Wikipedia was created for and the policy is based on. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 19:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _signed, Willondon (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. _signed, Willondon (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

This is not an edit war. It is to put the facts based on ruling of The United Nations WIPO. Deleting the entire section of socially contributing content is an edit war of paid writer. If you have a problem with this content, you can "edit" without deleting the entire section.

If posting the facts for social good is considered a problem for you, the advertising content of Victorinox page which is the entire page, should be edited first. All the photos and contents are written by paid writers to advertise Victorinox. If Victorinox is a transparent company, the United Nations WIPO ruling should not be feared or obsessed by Wikipedia writers to end up in deleting the "entire" section. You are welcome to edit the wording of the Victorinox Abuse Case section, but not deleting the whole section because these are the published articles and the ruling statements called, the facts for social good. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

This is not the first time the same reaction occurred by paid writers on Victorinox page. We have no hesitation to report each of you as paid writer to Wikipedia, sending threats of blocking of misusing a word, "vandalism" which is opposite from raising awareness of social issues. The argument here is against violence of women, trying to cover up anything negative but facts on Victorinox. This does not happen to any pages unless paid writers are watching the page, in this case, Victorinox. You cannot delete the whole section with published articles and official ruling, especially the United Nations. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

We have been saving this arguments in PDF for Wikipedia legal submission. This is a advertising page sealed by paid writers. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Truthforsocialgood reported by User:AntiDionysius (Result: ). Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

I have posted a very simple content of the section that is based on the published article and ruling. If this section is deleted, it is 100% confirmed that these editors constantly deleting the "whole" section are paid writers by Victorinox and the page is a full advertising which violates Wikipedia policy. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

You are welcome to go make your case on the Edit Warring Noticeboard. Please note though, that over there they deal purely with behavioural issues vis-a-vis the Edit Warring Policy, and do not discuss content issues. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

TO OTHER EDITORS: ENGAGEMENT SHOULD CEASE DUE TO THREATS OF LEGAL ACTION

Engagement with this editor should cease right now, because of the threat of legal action. [1] _signed, Willondon (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Reporting the deletion of the entire section that is based on the facts and the purpose of social good is not a legal threat. Wikipedia has a legal division when the page is an advertising protected by paid writers. Read the threads of this discussion page. The threats of multiple paid writers covering the truth of actual legal case ruling is violation of Wikipedia policy and regulations. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

We are actually a charity oranization for children and women with legal counsels. We have just reported all of you as paid writers working for Victorinox Wikipedia page of all languages to Wikipedia's legal division. It is against the Wikipedia regulations and you cannot block a writer for social good. Truthforsocialgood (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)