User talk:Truthseeker 85.5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Truthseeker 85.5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  abakharev 08:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edits as 83.5.*.* anon[edit]

Please avoid stalking other editors, re-read WP:STALK, also usually it makes a better impression if a user uses his own account instead of dynamic addresses and through-away socks. This way you can download images, edit semi-protected articles, use watchlist. It is also simplifies communication with other editors and makes you less prone to the allegation of the abusive use of multiple accounts per WP:SOCK abakharev 07:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I'd have to say it doesn't look good that all your edits appear to be a reaction to Ghirlandajo. Can you explain why you need to track him in this way? Blnguyen | rant-line 08:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

It's probably best if you have a long term interest in contributing to use a username.Blnguyen | rant-line 08:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't post personal attacks[edit]

Hello, Truthseeker. I just caught sight of this remark of yours, that you posted a few days ago on Thatcher131's RFA. To go off at a tangent at one user's RFA in order to sneer at another user in such a way is extremely inappropriate. If you have no respect for Ghirlandajo, then please show a little self-respect. Don't post personal attacks. Bishonen | talk 02:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC).

Civility[edit]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I would strongly appreciate if you remove this xenophobic comment. Alex Bakharev 01:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Support Alex.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  12:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka[edit]

Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. However, I still intend to continue contributing in a positive manner to Wikipedia, and if there is anything that I can do in the future to help further address your concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. --Elonka 10:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you.

Such edits are unacceptable. Not only spamming people's talk pages asking for votes uncool, but such attacks violate the WP:NPA policy.

Please do not remove this notice. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 11:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:NPA[edit]

Why do you insist on styling me "hyrla" in your edit summaries? Is this a pejorative term in Polish? --Ghirla -трёп- 12:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

On your "archivhing"[edit]

Stop-hand-caution.png

You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. This is a bad idea. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they are put here because other editors think that your behavior needs improvement, and we're giving you the courtesy of letting you know. Please respond by changing your behavior, and please stop removing the warnings. Thank you.

It's clear that you are not archiving this page, but rather removing notices. In addition, a thread has been started on WP:AN/I related to your behavior. In light of your increasingly disruptive behavior, including several warnings about violating a broad range of Wikipedia policy, I am blocking your account for three days. Hopefully in this time you may consider why this happened, and how you may change your behavior and become a constructive contributor to our encyclopedia, which is the outcome the entire community would prefer. Best regards, RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 13:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Spam and Wikipedia:Civility[edit]

Please read this policy. Some advertising is allowed, but some is looked down upon. Also, the tone of any ads should be non-inflammatory and neutral, as you have been notified before. If you want to help any side, please don't undermine it with uncivil behaviour.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  15:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

1 month block[edit]

Hello, I have blocked you for 1 month because I have to agree with Irpen on WP:AN/I. You have been stalking a couple of editors for couple months now. While it was kept under control and never errupted into flame wars it was (for some strange reason) tollerated. But your recent comments I believe are the last drops. If you change your mind, come back and make good contributions towards encyclopedia and not personal vendeta, I will be the first one to welcome you. Have a nice vacation, Renata 17:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Various phobias[edit]

Hi, I would agree that the king of Poland's name should be spelled according to the Polish language scholrship, but I was not able to participate in the discussion, because I am not a very frequent editor due to all the work I have to do in real life. I have noticed that there is kind of a weird tendencies on wikipedia and I don't really believe that it can really be written from a NPOV, because there simply are more Russian, than Polish users and obviously people try to implement their own agendas, than try to follow the creditable sources. You can see Sokhumi, it is also the case there and I would advise you to take it easy, because there are so many vandals in the world, I don't believe that we can totally hunt them down. I will be willing to help you ou next time if you are experencing rude POV puhings. Cheers! SosoMK 17:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked again[edit]

Upon your return, it seems that you've restored to stalking and harassment almost immediately. And because of such, I've reblocked you - this time for 2 months. Please seriously consider what you're here to do, as it appears your mind has not changed just yet. Khoikhoi 23:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Truthseeker 85.5 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

Reconciliatory tone interpreted as personal attack with vague explanation of "stalking". See recent edits for proof. Referal to previous block is also on shaky foundations of "stalking" (what, whom?). See below to properly assess the situation, following more tailing by Irpen.

Decline reason:

I have reviewed your edits in question, and it's apparent that you're less interested in contributing to the project than you are to pursuing some sort of agenda with other users. Wait out your new block and consider exactly what it is that you're here for. If the answer is anything other than contributing to an encyclopedia, then consider finding another website. - CHAIRBOY () 00:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

See this and this for what was behind the original block and this for what brought about the current block's extension. --Irpen 23:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
  • For instance [1]. See Renata3 page comments and see who is stalking who. It was Irpen to turn this into some personal affair, when he decided to suggest blocking me. Im afraid this might turn into a spiral of megalomania, if such undeserved critique receives such approval (from a select few).
And as I predicted in my "personal attack":
/Your campaign for censorship got a strong head start. I dont blame you, as it's the guy below who is adding fuel to the fire. Friends? :) Think twice when you give weight to what may be insinuations. Truthseeker 85.5 20:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)/
Irpen generated so much interest as to get me blocked in a whiff.
-Truthseeker 85.5 23:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)