User talk:Trying345topoiu

April 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Nabil Gabol has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added up to date information where the subject of the article i.e the named individual Nabil Gabol was reelected to the national assembly. User Saqib is notorious for attacking and damaging articles of non PTI politicians Trying345topoiu (talk) 01:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you said "fixed typo" and that's obviously a lie. Drmies (talk) 01:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at Talk:Nabil Gabol, you may be blocked from editing. Don't talk about fellow editors like that. You were reverted for a very good reason, and User:Saqib explained why. Drmies (talk) 01:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Nabil Gabol, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Muffin(talk page ain't working) 02:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the talk page of the said article. The last consensus was reached which states that NAB inquiry was inconsequential and thus removed 5 years ago. I would appreciate it if you would remove the change you made as per the consensus on the articles talk page. Thank you.. Trying345topoiu (talk) 02:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's only 2 people. How can it be a consensus? The only ones I see that were reached are the murder one. Muffin(talk page ain't working) 02:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the way forward? The Alleged NAB inquiry was removed from the article 6 years ago and only added yesterday by User Saqib. There is no progress on the said inquiry which points to the fact that it is dropped. In fact a thorough search for the said inquiry will not bring back any results on the agency official website either which again proves that it is inconsequential. Trying345topoiu (talk) 02:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checked the edit history. The only edit Saqib made was this one [[1]] . I would suggest getting a rfc to see if everyone agrees on your point that it should be removed. Muffin(talk page ain't working) 02:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but considering I'm a novice can you please help me. I have no idea what RFC is. Thank you Trying345topoiu (talk) 22:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing to note, the attempt to remove the NAB inquiry was from a user who was blocked on multiple COI and copyright violations. Muffin(talk page ain't working) 02:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Nabil Gabol, you may be blocked from editing. Muffin(talk page ain't working) 02:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

@MuffinHunter0 and Drmies: I've filed an SPI because I believe this is the same individual. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trying345topoiu —Saqib (talk | contribs) 06:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no other account. I'm a newbie. I have no intention to mislead or be a sock puppet. I come to Wikipedia only to add value. Please restore and if anything help me be more effective. Thank you Trying345topoiu (talk) 22:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

intention to mislead or be a sock puppet. I come to Wikipedia only to add value. Please restore and if anything help me be more effective. Thank you

SPI

Latest comment: 16 hours ago

April 2024

Latest comment: 13 minutes ago

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trying345topoiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no other account. I'm a newbie. I have no intention to mislead or be a sock puppet. I come to Wikipedia only to add value. Please restore and if anything help me be more effective. Thank youTrying345topoiu (talk) 23:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's glaringly obvious that this is not your only account. JBW (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Trying345topoiu (talk) 23:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trying345topoiu (talk) 23:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]