User talk:Tseym19
February 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Virginity— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Virginity. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Virginity was changed by Tseym19 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850064 on 2016-02-18T02:31:00+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Virginity with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Virginity. Donner60 (talk) 02:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)