User talk:TucanHolmes

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, TucanHolmes! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 03:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Smallpox

Hi, I suggest your read WP:3RR and explain why you think the discussion should not be collapsed. And note, it was not closed. Graham Beards (talk) 16:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be collapsed, because there is still a productive part of the discussion on whether a FAQ section at the top of the talk page should be added for users offended by the image, to ensure this issue doesn't resurface forever.

So why did you not say this in an edit summary? Graham Beards (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found it to be obvious. Sorry, I should have clarified that. TucanHolmes (talk) 16:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It takes two to tango. My apologies for not checking the history and missing your comment.Graham Beards (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Smallpox - survey

I see that you've also searched for unbiased outside opinion on the photo. I appreciate that and I'm more convinced this was a good thing to do as we came to the same conclusion. Thanks! – attomir (talk | contribs) 23:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for wrapping up your findings so thoroughly. It would've taken me ages to present my results. TucanHolmes (talk) 10:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uyghur genocide has an RFC

Uyghur genocide has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#PailSimon. // Timothy :: talk 18:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy St. Patrick's Day

Happy St. Patrick's Day!
I hope your St. Patrick's Day is enjoyable and safe. Hopefully next year there will be more festive celebrations.
Best wishes from Los Angeles. // Timothy :: talk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Eclipse has been accepted

Red Eclipse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

IceWelder [✉] 19:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanto

Not sure what you mean by your edit summary admonishing me for whatever it was. I copy pasted one sentence from the body of the article into the intro to improve it, as lots of people do, I don't see anything wrong with that, but you remove it and say what I pasted wasn't correct. If it wasn't correct why was it in the body of the article? You make no sense. (Personal attack removed) --Max Loungeroom (talk) 04:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Max Loungeroom please remain civil. I'm sorry if my edit summary was too harsh; the information that you re-included had been removed during a previous copy edit, because it gave too much room to trivial information (note the "too much room", I'm not saying that this info shouldn't be included in the lead at all). The old lead focussed primarily on historical or internal details, and devoted almost no space to the actual structure of the language; compare the lead of English language. The Montevideo Resolution is primarily concerned with UNESCO (and the United Nations as well, but that's not the point); the problem is the way you phrased it: In 1954, the United Nations granted official support to Esperanto as an international auxiliary language in the Montevideo Resolution.—this creates the impression that Esperanto is used as a working language of the UN (which it isn't). I will also adjust the paragraph concerning this topic in the article body. TucanHolmes (talk) 08:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Hi TucanHolmes, this is Staplerhorse here. I loved your work on the Esperanto article, so I'd love to give you this. :)

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thanks for your amazing work on Esperanto! Best, Staplerhorse (talk) 11:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! That article has some great content in it, it just needs a little attention :). TucanHolmes (talk) 16:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Community Sanctions Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

Hi TucanHolmes,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 01:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

New library collections
Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Welcome!

Talk:Smallpox

Talk:Smallpox - survey

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Uyghur genocide has an RFC

ANI Notice

Happy St. Patrick's Day

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Eclipse has been accepted

Esperanto

Barnstar

Community Sanctions Alert

Anarchism

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

Books & Bytes – Issue 50

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

Introduction to contentious topics

Books & Bytes – Issue 61

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

Books & Bytes – Issue 64