User talk:UBX/ignostic

Untitled

Humm...

If the user doesn't care whether God exists or not, why there is a symbol that suggest rejection of the idea of a God on the picture?
I'm not sure that the phrase expresses well the ignostic point of view. --Leinad ¬ ^{pois não?} 18:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't like the icon on the pic myself, but it was the best I could come up with in the wee hours, and was planning to come back to it. I think your definition is better, though. CenozoicEra 21:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm going to delete the "user ignostic" entry from the userboxes for the moment because I'm not satisfied with the box. If anyone would like to re-instate it (hopefully with a better box) they may.CenozoicEra 22:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the person who changed the definition was User:Silence. ;-) --Leinad ¬

^{pois não?} 22:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm crazy that way. And I agree the template needs some work. The definition's still not perfect (though if no one objects to it, I think it's slightly snazzy), and the image is reallly hard to see (grey box on grey-haired god is no good). May I suggest using a different-colored "X" (black?), or perhaps an upside-down God image, instead? I think it should stay on the Wikipedia:Userboxes/Religion page even though it's not perfect, though; that way it can receive more attention from editors! -Silence 23:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]