User talk:UltraZit

To the unknown / anon user / poster: This is a formal warning. Please cease and desist from your vandalism of the St Paul's page immediately. This is a repeated level 3 warning, before I seek to lock the page against you.

Regarding this dispute: I have requested a 3O on this page (resolution of editorial dispute by third party). I suspect what I am actually dealing with here is not a sensible dispute, but a familial-based wish to have the issue removed from the public eye.

Content was removed regarding a private email source which is not verifiable. This fails to meet Wikipedia's standards for sources / content and was thus removed.

Content regarding legal follow-up was biased and non-factual, without supporting content (no evidence relating to the statement in cited source) and was thus removed.

Suspected vandalism of this page by partisan sources is occurring and have placed a watch on the page. May request lock and third party assistance if it continues.

Content regarding that pew sheet "referred incorrectly to his "resignation"" is incorrect => aforementioned pew sheet is available on wikimedia commons, and clearly states the following content:

Announcement from the Bishop

It is with great regret that I announce the departure of the Director of Music, Mr David Burchell. For more than two years, there has been an ongoing disagreement involving the Director of Music which The Chapter, The Dean and myself have tried, with the utmost care and patience to resolve. After the expenditure of considerable time, energy and money it appeared, at the end of 2010, that a satisfactory outcome had been reached. Disappointingly, this has not proven practicable, and it is the considered and prayerful opinion of the Dean and myself that in the best interests of the future development of the Cathedral, Mr Burchell’s enormous musical skills would be most usefully applied elsewhere.

+ Kelvin Wright

Regards, UltraZit.

wb

Hello. You have a new message at User talk:WikiManOne's talk page.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent conflict of interest on City of Dunedin Choir

Hello UltraZit. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article City of Dunedin Choir , you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to St. Paul's Cathedral, Dunedin, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 04:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re your concern at Talk:St. Paul's Cathedral, Dunedin: Please assume good faith. Yes, we disagree about what should or should not be included. Yes, you are connected to one side of the issue. The fact that I disagree with you does not mean I am in any way connected to the "other" side or that I am trying to silence ("censor") you. I invite you to review my edits, my user page and my talk page to see if there is any indication that I am in any meaningful way connected to New Zealand, Anglicanism, choirs, etc. Seriously: I've been here over 5 years. Check my edits and see what you can find. Other than disagreeing with you, where is there any indication that I am biased for or against the people involved, the church, etc.? - SummerPhD (talk) 02:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Cheers, thanks UltraZit (talk) 03:32, 11 October 2011 (UTC)UltraZit. TransporterMan (TALK) 13:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]