User talk:UnbiasedVictory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

UnbiasedVictory (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)

Request reason:

Hello, I've been accused of using multiple accounts to edit articles on Wikipedia.. again, and believe I should be unblocked. I've made it clear before that everyone, administrators included, can do whatever it is they need to do to confirm that this is the only account I use on this website. I haven't made an edit while logged out either, so I really don't understand why I was blocked. I'm sorry for any confusion this may have caused, but I haven't broken any rules and feel this should be reversed. Thank you. UnbiasedVictory (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

On further examination, it appears I was mistaken. This was a rather complex SPI and it seems you got caught in the net. Please accept my apologies, and to make amends, should nayone ever have any questions about this block, please feel free to send them to me and I will gladly explain that it should not be seen as evidence of misconduct on your part. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.
  • It's no problem at all, thank you for taking the time to view and accept my request. UnbiasedVictory (talk) 22:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Colonial militia in Canada, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You can't just say that none of what you included is incorrect.  BC  talk to me 21:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Just for the record, nobody has any particular reason to doubt that you're acting in good faith, but due to Wikipedia's open "anyone can edit" structure we do have a problem with people actually adding inaccuracies and outright falsehoods to our articles. So if you're going to change information in an article, please ensure that you're actually citing it to a reliable source by which we can verify that your edit is actually correct — this is especially critical if you're going against what another source in the article already says. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
I understand, I've only added battles in which Canadian militia were known for participating and prevailing in, which the article had already listed without references so I didn't feel it was obligatory to provide one myself. I apologize for the confusion. UnbiasedVictory (talk) 01:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)