User talk:Valentine82

Welcome

Hello, Valentine82! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jock Boy (t-c) 23:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Chris Hecker

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chris Hecker. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 23:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fallout 3

If you would care to delineate the purposes of your edits to Fallout 3, I would be better able to reach a compromise with you.
The fact tag was there for the purpose of eliciting contributions to cite it, not so that the preceding material could be removed. This I can understand to be a misunderstanding. However, your following edit is a mystery to me. It is not balanced to state only that the game rewards both good and bad behaviour, without understanding the context in which those rewards take place, most particularly, that the game also punishes bad behaviour. You removed reference to this, leaving it seem as though the game is utterly equivocal towards moral choices. In the meantime, I shall be restoring the material, with as much reference to what I believe to be your point, as possible, while retaining the important facts and perspective Anarchangel (talk) 07:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The game also punishes Good behavior. Regardless, the primary reason the section was removed is because it's far too obtuse. --Valentine82 (talk) 11:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: F3

Sorry if some of my comments came off a bit wrong, the thing was that the original editor who added it obviously wanted to push his view on some of the things in F3 without regard to what is his opinion and what was actually seen as controversial. I probably (wrongly) assumed you had the same agenda so, sorry about that. BTW, there is some discussion on Talk:Fallout 3 where your input would be appreciated :) --aktsu ^(t / c) 13:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]