User talk:Vanais

Welcome!

Hello, Vanais, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Faithism, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuzDat 15:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Faithism

I have nominated Faithism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faithism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WuhWuzDat 15:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Help request

{{adminhelp}} I found a WT note after a comment on the history of the edit page of Oahspe , after I had provided a ref to a link in place of a "citation needed" comment; the link I had provided pointed to a list including the organizations mentioned, but not exactly to the two ones in object; I just wonder if this "WT" was appropriate; Thanks for help and attention, sorry for trouble;Vanais (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I presume you mean this edit, where HandThatFeeds (talk · contribs) reverted your addition of a link to www.novelguide.com with the edit summary "does not appear to be a reliable source". There is nothing inappropriate about that comment: it may be that HandThatFeeds failed to find the particular entry you meant in that rather long list, but more likely s/he did not consider www.novelguide.com to be a reliable source in the Wikipedia sense - click that link for more details. Just being present on the web does not make a source reliable - it depends on factors such as whether anyone can post to the site, and whether it has any form of editorial control or fact-checking. Wikipedia, for instance, is not considered a reliable source. In any case, the first thing you should do is discuss it with HandThatFeeds. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for quick reply and help, I actually meant the TW note (Wikipedia Twinkle ) that I understood is a kind of a red card (sorry for having written WT) ; it's here: [[1]] ; with regard to the opinion on the reliability, no problem, I had already posted a note on the talk page of the user HandThatFeeds ; Thank You again,Vanais (talk) 15:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

No, a (TW) notation is not any kind of red card, it just indicates an edit that was made with the help of WP:Twinkle, a set of scripts that partly automate some kinds of editing task. You might also see (HG) for edits made with WP:Huggle, and various others. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank You, all clear;Regards, Vanais (talk) 15:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)