User talk:Vanles

Welcome!

Hi Vanles! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 06:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Christopher K. Glass, from its old location at User:Vanles/sandbox/Christopher K. Glass. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 06:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher K. Glass (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSCHOLAR / WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. UC San Diego School of Medicine, as his employer, is a primary source and is therefore not considered independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher K. Glass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christopher K. Glass, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vanles! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Christopher K. Glass

Hello, Vanles. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christopher K. Glass, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 03:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Christopher K. Glass has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Christopher K. Glass. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 01:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher K. Glass (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Certainly notable, but still written promotionally -- don't use "Dr.", avoid adjective of praise, emove minor awards, focus on major ones.

Additionally, do you have any conflict of intrest to weclare? See WP:COI and, if appropriate WP:PAID.

When fixed, and coi stated if necessary , notify me on my user talk for a rapid re-review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher K. Glass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christopher K. Glass, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher K. Glass has been accepted

Christopher K. Glass, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MORE SPECIFICALLY: the biographical material is now properly cited, though I had to move the references around a good deal in orde to do that. The reference format is still irregular, and redundant, but there is no actual requittrement that it be in any one form. see WP:REFBEGIN for the preferred form. MORE IMPORTANT, A good deal of the research section has been remioved, as almost a word for word copy of http://glasslab.ucsd.edu/documents/202101%20Biosketch%20Glass,%20C.pdf. But in a sense this is his own statement, and he might therefore own the copyright, not the university., the way some faculty pages are. If so, and he wishes to release it under a WP - compatable free license, see WP:DCM for the proper formalities. (An alternative is a rather thorough rewrite of this, if you wish to cover the various field, ) DGG ( talk ) 05:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]