User talk:Vasilij~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Vasilij~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russian Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! --Ghirla ^-трёп- 16:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Vasilij 16:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you note

Hi, Vasilij! You accidentally thanked Ghirla on the actual template page instead of here. I moved your note to your user talk page—don't worry, it was easily fixable. Please accept my welcome greetings as well.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 17:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you as well, Ёжики! Vasilij 18:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Avvakum - executed for heresy?

Stating that a person was executed for heresy is mostly a rather controversial thing to do. Some may think the things a person (in this case Avvakum) stands for are a heresy, some others may not. Who has got the unquestionable authority to decide on what is a heresy and what isn't? It's obvious that one is dealing with a very delicate matter.

I for one am opposed to categories having anything to do with heresies, because one is bound to make subjective and arguable evaluations with which others are bound to disagree. In fact, I think that such categories are irrelevant. Vasilij 17:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Edinoverie and Rome

Спаси Хирстосъ! InfernoXV (talk) 14:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Во славу Божiю. Vasilij (talk) 18:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Ambrosii of Belaya Krinitsa

I must apologise for hastily tagging the Introduction section of Saint Ambrosii of Belaya Krinitsa to be merged into the Old Believers article, and have explained my previous and revised positions at the talk page – Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for message. No need to apologize! Vasilij (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vasilij and all other contributors … may thanks, a remarkable effort. One query relating to a potentially critical contradiction. Under the heading; “Main alterations introduced by Patriarch Nikon” – ‘Sign of the cross’, you have written under the heading; ‘Old Practice’, “Two fingers, pointer finger straight, middle finger bent.” There can be no misunderstanding what that says. ‘Middle finger is bent’ Under the heading; “Differences between the Old Believers and post-Nikonian Russian Orthodoxy” (First section) it says; “Old Believers use two fingers while making the Sign of the Cross (two fingers straightened, three folded). Thus you now included another variation of doing the sign of the cross? Which one is correct? Middle finger is ‘bent’ OR ‘straight’, which one is correct? I do not know but I want to know. Regardless, I loved this reading. Dia Genitrix — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dia Genitrix (talk • contribs) 14:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you mean and I trust I've fixed it. Regards, Vasilij (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Vasilij. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Vasilij~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

20:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan Ambrose investigation

Dear Vasili! Could you please provide some links to the information about the 1899 investigation by the Ecumenical Patriarchate about metropolitan Ambrose and the Old Believers' hierarchy established by him? 178.67.195.224 (talk) 21:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]