User talk:Vaudedoc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Vaudedoc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Alientraveller (talk) 18:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete my comment? [1] Alientraveller (talk) 17:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry! Accidental deletion when I was cut and pasting. I went back and reinserted it. Historians and computers were not made for one another... --Vaudedoc (talk) 17:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I know you're interested in editing articles about films so you should read WP:MOSFILMS, and overall a look at each MOS page would be worthwhile. Sorry if you might have, just checking of course and making you feel more comfortable... Alientraveller (talk) 10:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
We all get carried away, and thank you for putting me in my place. Yes, civility is a point I easily slip on. But you misunderstand: I was restoring the fan response. Alientraveller (talk) 23:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Indiana Jones WikiProject Now Open![edit]

I have finally created a WikiProject for Indiana Jones! Check it out. -- MISTER ALCOHOL T C 21:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Cynthia Rhodes[edit]

As long as you keep the facts, it doesn't matter to me. Oh and she is on IMDB. Click here to read her listing. I have no idea how you could've had a problem finding her listing, but whatever. Happy Editing! --Candy156sweet (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I find that most people spend more time explaining themselves on Wikipedia then doing the editing. I'm sure you've done some of that in the short time you've been editing, and I've had to do that numerous times in the three years I've been on here. Here it is: You wrote this on your editing reason, "Incorporated the cite's own language, but is this reference even accurate? She's not on IMDB. Proof?" This revision occured at this date: 2009-02-10T01:50:28. Truth be told whether or not you read IMDB or saw the listing is fine with me as long as you are accurate. As long as everything is cited and written correctly, I don't care. I'm not being mean or argumentative, I just want to make it all simple and uncomplicated. --Candy156sweet (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Sphinx Head[edit]

There is a long history of vandalism to this page between two groups. I ask that you also look at the page for "Quill and Dagger." A mutual change of clarification for the NYT article may be in order. However, in the meantime I ask that you refrain from continuing to edit the page until the issue is resolved. Thank you very much for you help and understanding. Cornell1890 (talk) 14:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)


For your information, four University of Miami editors have started Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Racepacket. Racepacket (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh come on. This is the third editor you contacted for this. The editors I contacted were done so in order to build upon the various grievances we have with your edits Racepacket.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:21, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

20th century French drama[edit]

Hi Vaudedoc . I noticed that you have made edits to the article on The Madwoman of Chaillot. I am looking for people who are interested in creating quality articles on the plays of Jean Giraudoux and related subjects. Giraudoux is not a big enough subject to be a WikiProject; but all of 20th century French drama certainly would be. For a complete outline of my ideas on the subject, see my personal page at the link below. I see that you are interested in vaudeville, but you do have a degree in Theatre Studies. If you are interested, (does not Giraudoux owe something to vaudeville?) drop me a note on that same personal page.

Project on 20th century French drama --Foobarnix (talk) 06:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)