User talk:VegettoEX

It's been a far time since, but thanks...

... for contributing to the Coola article. Having spent *considerable* time overhauling that page (synopsis and story were... well, fairly damned abominable), I was surprised to see you lend a hand yourself, chiefly because I used your revamp on Tullece as my base. I thought of using the Dragon Ball daizenshuu gifs of Coola from Daizex in my original edit, but thought that'd be akin to stealing your layout. 'Course, you providing them made things THAT MUCH easier.

One thing of note though - I had wanted to give the names of Coola's cronies and any puns behind them, but unfortunately I'm lacking when it comes to translations. Any way of adding these - if any - to Coola's page?

Thanks again for your help in improving the article. Papacha 08:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eep. Managed to download episode #0007 of the podcast, I'll see what I can glean from it, though I can't promise anything quite as in-depth. So your assistance would probably still be very kosher. At least I've got grounds for a start. Papacha 11:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo~

Thanks so much for enjoying the site and such :). I've gone in and thrown the henchmen section in the Coola page. I'm not sure about its placement on the page; it makes sense to me to include it below Coola's own name pun, but it's weird having it ABOVE the movies they're in... but it still feels like it's the most appropriate space for it. I'm not married to it, but my suggestion is probably to keep it where it is.

Thanks for being so great with regards to the Zarbon nonsense, too!

Nice work

Zarbon... Y'know they say taste is relative, but I swear that guy's is inbred. Sheesh. Anyway, I merged what I had in my revamp to what you had added previously in the article, and I think it came out nicely. I agree it looks a bit off where it sits now too, but yeah, it's the most rightful place. Hopping to the next villain I've started overhauling Garlic Jr., 'cause goodness knows not many a fanboy is touchin' *that* place. Oy.

Thanks for the romanizations and Japanese characters; I'd of been at a loss without them. Papacha 14:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coola reverts

Went ahead and changed it back. User w/ the same IP made his own special adjustments to the Tullece page as well, also taken care of for the time being.

Ai-friggin'-yah. Papacha 09:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And not that this'll change anything, but...

Is there anything in the daizenshuu about the linearity of Freeza and his family's power structure? More of a podcast question, but dude, myself and others are going round-and-round with Zarbon on Freeza Family Tree on the issue, and while some of the more rampant silliness has been stunted (Broli is a member of Freeza's army!) the rest is for naught. He being the article's creator only makes editing more of a chore.

They'd probably be prey to a roll-back, but I'm interested to know, because as far as I know Toriyama and Toei never really dove into the subject. Papacha 10:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know you don't sign on that much ~~

But it's worth a shot. Third opinions are wanted from various contibuting editors to DragonBall articles to receive help and third opinion on a dispute between Zarbon and myself on the List of Frieza Related Characters in Dragon Ball. And lucky, lucky, you just so happen to be one, and an authority at that. ^_^ Any input/discussion on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Papacha 15:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing out vandals

Thanks for removing part of the kiddy vandalism, but I had to do another revert over your own to reintroduce a lost section back into the article. Just wanted you to know the reason why. Voice of Treason 00:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links

I noticed you provide direct links to your site's homepage within articles and in the External Links sections. You shouldn't do that anymore, and remove the ones you placed. Wikipedia is not a place to promote your own personal site. If you want to use it for reference, link directly to the page that has the reference. Not the homepage.--Koji Dude 03:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo. I don't add links to my site. Other people do. I'm not about to remove it if someone else put it there, and I'm certainly not going anywhere and adding my own site in any article what-so-ever. I'm somewhat offended that you'd even think that; Daizenshuu EX is well above that kind of petty nonsense. VegettoEX 20:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If what you say is true, then explain this edit I reverted. Also, all of the articles on the list on your userpage coincidently had a link to your homepage somewhere in there. I'm just saying, I had every right to assume it was you, and I didn't intend to offend you.--Koji Dude 05:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do the research before making the assumptions. Go back further in the revision history for that page. The link was already there. I just edited around it. Apparently someone found my site of enough authority that they wanted to cite it, so I left that in and just wrote around it. The reason I edit ANY pages here is generally because I follow a link to it from my web referrals, and I see grossly inaccurate information. I can tell you that I did link my site on the Super Dragonball Z page (a link you removed), where I was directly citing some piece of specific information; you'll see the citation in the article in addition to the bottom of the page (that's why it's a reference, and not a normal external link). And then you've got cases like the Freeza article, which I've never touched in my life, and you still decided to remove it. I understand the reasonings on that one, but I fail to understand why you didn't just edit it to what you're literally typing right there on the page that it should be edited to. It seems like a very unfocused and unresearched personal attack. Again, I can understand your logical reasonings behind it, but I'm flabbergasted as to why you didn't just look further back in the revision histories... Let me know if you need anything else. Cheers.VegettoEX 7:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

It wasn't a personal attack, it was a notice. I didn't go that far into the history because, as you can see, it was 3:47 in the morning. I apologize for making assumptions, but I'm greatly offended that you would consider following Wikipedia policy a personal attack.--Koji Dude 19:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was only verging on considering it a personal attack because, and consider this from my perspective, every page that contained a link to my site that other people had put the citation for was being removed. I'm glad all is well, and I hope that looking through my contributions, you can see I have more than every well-meaning intention in the fandom of DB, and have so for years upon years. VegettoEX 18:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um... sir?

I hope that rant on my discussion page was directed toward SilentRage and not myself, as I never said anything about you. In fact, to quote Mr. Rage's own discussion page, "I actually don't listen to podcasts, nor care what people say about me". The S 15:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. I was literally saying to myself "Jesus Christ... why do I get dragged into every feud related to Daizenshuu EX?" The S 23:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And here we go again

Oh joy - another move request. Logic isn't enough apparently.

Talk:Hercule (Dragon Ball)

-- DesireCampbell 03:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh...heheh, Desire beat me to it. Yeah, we need your voice over there. Onikage725 07:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've always wanted to know something

I love your website Daizenshuu Ex a lot and one thing I've always wanted to find out: What was Akira Toriyama's original ending to the Dragon Ball series exactly? Was it just that the master plan by Kami-sama and King Kai to revive the Nameks and Vegeta with Earth's Dragonballs to fail and no one (not even Vegeta) would be brought back to life? Or was it just that everyone killed by Freeza would be revived with the balls, then be brought to Earth (all same stuff) except Goku would be gone forever and not land on Yaardrat? I really, really wanna know Toriyama's original ending. Answer me A.S.A.P. Thanks! PL(DB) 07:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Coola sparking.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Coola sparking.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sparking jp box.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sparking jp box.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 04:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Piririn.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Piririn.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spdbz char select.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spdbz char select.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spdbz cover jp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spdbz cover jp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spdbz loading.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spdbz loading.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spdbz logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spdbz logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sparking jp box.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sparking jp box.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sparking jp box.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sparking jp box.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]