User talk:Vgeek15

what is going on? what is the internet?

Orphaned non-free image File:ECampus.com Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ECampus.com Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 06:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vgeek15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why would including objective mortgage origination data from a credible source (what other sites list mortgage data besides originationdata.com? If you look at the actual site, it has all types of other information with regards to types of loans originated, ethnicities, loan values and other contextual information) be counted as spam? These were not spam, the edits added value to their respective articles and helped with context with regard to each company's mortgage business and their relative visibility in the mortgage industry.

Decline reason:

While it might indeed prove a reliable source, the fact that you added so many links to it to so many articles so quickly suggests you had greater motives than improving the encyclopedia. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vgeek15 (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vgeek15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I found this page List of largest banks in the United States and added the applicable links to members of this list. I had originally added links to banks I was originally researching (based on mortgage loan origination volumes) and got a thank you from user TheTechnician27, so I thought it was okay to add as appropriate when I came across the above list. I'm not paid or affiliated with that site, if that is a relevant consideration, but I don't think there is an easy way to verify that claim.

Decline reason:

You'll need to agree to stop adding links to originationdata.com before an unblock can be considered. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We don't need the whole url; simply place the title of the target page in double brackets, as I did here. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand that a wholesale change to many articles should be discussed first? 331dot (talk) 08:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do now, and will read about how the discussion process works before doing any bulk edits in the future. Vgeek15 (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]