User talk:Vianello/Archives/2014/January
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vianello. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Forgive me for asking, but aren't PRODs supposed to live for 7 days? I am the editor who proposed deletion and obviously I agree with the outcome, but I only nominated it yesterday, and I don't think any of the speedy criteria applied. Maybe you thought this was a case of WP:SNOW, or maybe there's a coding error where new year rollovers are concerned? Happy New Year, by the way :) Ivanvector (talk) 16:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, you're completely right! This was a mistake on my part. I was simply on the wrong category page. I thought I was exclusively looking at expired PRODs. This is definitely not one! I'll be re-adding the page to let it lapse properly. Thanks for bringing that to my attention! I expect it will probably end up going out, but it'd be best to keep proper procedure, just in case. - Vianello (Talk) 18:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Regarding your block of 68.91.88.97
Be advised that User:Eblakcats is a single purpose account who falsely accused User:Michaeldsuarez of being the culprit, per THIS DENIAL on WPO. Carrite (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
request for page protection
Hello, I have put in a request at RPP, but since you are familiar with User talk:Widenmerge - could you semi protect Talk:Gävle goat - the user has a very dynamic IP and are continuing the disruptive talk page edits.
Thanks. (if the talk page post had been an isolated incident, one could take it as a legitimate, but off, request. however, the initial string of posts by the IP (and the edits since) show that the user has a fixation on calling everything and presuming every edit is religious bigotry and so it was removed under WP:DNFTT -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 09:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- I agree completely on all counts. The initial edit by the named user makes it pretty clear they are not able to handle this matter in good faith. Thanks for letting me know about the continuing problem on the talk page. I've extended 1-day semi protection. Please let me or another admin know if anything else goes awry! - Vianello (Talk) 09:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- I have added the sockmaster to the userpage. --Bsadowski1 08:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm familiar with this sockmaster you've mentioned, but I'm not 100% sure I see what connects them to this particular account. Could you elaborate a little? I'm probably just missing something. - Vianello (Talk) 08:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I have added the sockmaster to the userpage. --Bsadowski1 08:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
The Conjowa 2
Hey, just dropped you a note to let you know that the page for The Conjowa 2 was speedied. I was checking the proposed deletion pages and noticed this one. Long story short, this is the latest attempt by the director to spam Wikipedia for his films. He's been blocked, but keeps creating new accounts. (sighs) Thanks for catching it and if you see any other entries about this film or the film series as a whole, let me know so I can take care of this stuff as quickly as possible. If it's for the first two films, I can delete them since they were deleted via an AfD. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up! I'll keep that in mind. I didn't realize this had been an ongoing issue like that .- Vianello (Talk) 06:18, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah... they've been pretty bad about trying to re-create the page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)