User talk:Vice regent/Archives/2016/October

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 India–Pakistan military confrontation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pre-emptive. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

cost of war

Excellent quote. I truly believe that we should not support war in any country/region. war brings lot of suffering to innocent people. But if it is thrust upon us we should defend ouselves, not crossing the limits and then we should try to hit the people who instigated it — Preceding unsigned comment added by MalikAttaRasool (talk • contribs) 07:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic 2016 India-Pakistan military confrontation. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Repeated reinstatements

Hi Vice regent, revert is highly improper. I have filed a WP:DRN case. The right thing for you to do would be to accept that there is a dispute and discuss it there. You can't say that there isn't a dispute and keep edit-warring. Pinging RegentsPark to advise you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

DRN case

Hi Vice regent, I would like to alert you that the DRN case on 2016 India-Pakistan military confrontation has been opened two days ago. Robert McClenon has indicated that we should check the progress and respond at least once in two days. I have made my statement and it is your turn to respond. As RegentsPark has advised you, this is the best way. Further it will also give you some experience in how to conduct discussions in contentious areas. I would highly advise participation. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Invite

Hello Vice regent/Archives/2016. You have been invited to join WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Asia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the particpants. If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge Invite (1)|~~~~}} Thanks, -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks @Capankajsmilyo:! Any specific ideas of what I can do? I'm open but I'd really prefer to write on something relating to India-Pakistan friendship. :)

VR _talk 04:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

How about history? Prior to 1800s... -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quote boxes

Hi Vice regent, those quote boxes are fiddly. It is hard to get them to work correctly. After each quotebox, you need to add {{clear}} so that it doesn't eat into what follows, as it happened with your version here. I have fixed it.

Perhaps you can add some of those missing references? We will probably need to talk about them. Especially the very first reference. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quote boxes

Hi Vice regent, those quote boxes are fiddly. It is hard to get them to work correctly. After each quotebox, you need to add {{clear}} so that it doesn't eat into what follows, as it happened with your version here. I have fixed it.

Perhaps you can add some of those missing references? We will probably need to talk about them. Especially the very first reference. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)