User talk:Vighnesh HJ

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Vighnesh HJ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Niranjan Vanalli, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niranjan Vanalli[edit]

The article Niranjan Vanalli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the only reliable third party source is a PR blurb about a non notable "award"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If Karnataka Sahitya Akademi Award were equally as prestigious as the Man Booker Prize, it would have an article and would be covered by the world press. Without evidence of the award being a significant award, my analysis stays the same. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:06, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Vighnesh HJ. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 12:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Vighnesh HJ. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Vanjagenije (talk) 12:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Vighnesh HJ. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Vanjagenije (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Reference errors on 14 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kaafiron Ki Namaaz page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]