User talk:Vinícius18

Welcome!

Hello, Vinícius18, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dloh cierekim 22:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for recent input on Brazil

Hi Vinícius18,

thanks for your contributions on Brazil! between you and User:Cristiano Tomás you are putting in plenty of new stuff

take care,

Magafuzula (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi vinicius,

a partir de agora, vamos usar o pagina de discussão para melhorar o artigo? Magafuzula (talk) 15:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will be removing many images

Perhaps it is best you remove the over images at the Brazil article. As per our MOS on the matter its best we dont sandwich text between images.Moxy (talk) 23:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could we get you to read over Wikipedia:Image dos and don'ts please.Moxy (talk) 00:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE take the time to read what has been written to you on this talk page - the article page - and my talk page....WP:IMAGELOCATION.Moxy (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple images in the same article can be staggered right-and-left. However, avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other, and between an image and an infobox or similar. If multiple related images are being placed on the right, then the template may be useful.

It is often preferable to place images of faces so that the face or eyes look toward the text. However, images of people need not be reversed simply to make the person's face point towards the text, and this should not be done if the reversal would materially mislead the viewer (e.g. by making the subject of the article or section appear to have a birthmark on the left side of his face, when the birthmark is actually on the right side).

An image should generally be placed in the section of the article that is most relevant to the image. Avoid referring to images as being on the left or right. Image placement is different for viewers of the mobile version of Wikipedia, and is meaningless to people having pages read to them by assistive software. Instead, use captions to identify images.

Google Translate....

Várias imagens do mesmo artigo pode ser escalonada direito e esquerdo. No entanto, evite imprensando o texto entre duas imagens que enfrentam uns aos outros, e entre uma imagem e uma infobox ou similar. Se várias imagens relacionadas estão sendo colocados à direita, em seguida, o modelo {{imagem}} múltipla pode ser útil.

Muitas vezes, é preferível colocar as imagens de rostos de modo que a cara ou os seus olhos para o texto. No entanto, imagens de pessoas não precisa ser revertida simplesmente para fazer ponto de o rosto da pessoa para o texto, e isso não deve ser feito se a reversão seria materialmente enganar o espectador (por exemplo, fazendo com que o assunto do artigo ou seção parece ter uma marca de nascença no lado esquerdo de seu rosto, quando a marca de nascença é, na verdade, no lado direito).

Uma imagem deve ser geralmente colocada na secção do artigo, que é o mais relevante para a imagem. Evite referindo-se às imagens como sendo do lado esquerdo ou direito. Posicionamento da imagem é diferente para os telespectadores da versão móvel da Wikipedia, e não faz sentido para as pessoas que têm páginas lidas a eles por software de apoio. Em vez disso, use legendas para identificar as imagens.

Pls try and follow our basic policy on images.Moxy (talk) 01:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you read English?Moxy (talk) 01:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Várias imagens do mesmo artigo pode ser escalonada direito e esquerdo. No entanto, evite imprensando o texto entre duas imagens que enfrentam uns aos outros, e entre uma imagem e uma infobox ou similar. Se várias imagens relacionadas estão sendo colocados à direita, em seguida, o modelo Template:Imagem múltipla pode ser útil.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image tutorial

Pls come to the article talk page at Talk:Brazil#mages before adding anymore random pictures to the article.Moxy (talk) 05:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Need assistance at the Brazil article Moxy (talk) 06:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Hello there. Thanks for your contributions; your enthusiasm is great. However, there are guidelines we use governing how and when images are placed in articles, and you can find these here. You don't seem to have read or understood these guidelines, and so I'm going to have to ask you to stop adding images to articles. You need to discuss with other editors and show that you understand how images should be used. If you have any questions feel free to ask me. I realize that English is not your first language and so communication is difficult, and another editor is trying to find someone who speaks Portuguese to help. I must warn you that if you continue to add images to articles in the way you have been I will be forced to block you from editing. Regards Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 09:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read what was above Vinícius18 before adding images again?Moxy (talk) 06:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last time

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

June 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. You have been warned several times by multiple editors about adding non-MOS images to articles but have continued the practice and refused to discuss.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 18:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Basalisk, I was coming here to do the same thing. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 19:46, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Vinícius18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for disruptive editing. At first I was desperate, thinking that i could no longer edit, but after a while, I began to read more about editing policy and I admit I made mistakes, once I put pictures with exaggerated sizes, thinking he was improving the article, but I was wrong. Sorry, I promise avoid edit wars and talk on pages of DISCUSSION, and so continue editing articles and other pending as I always do. Grateful! (I apologize if I wrong writing, is because I used the translator).Vinícius18 (talk) 06:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I am prepared to unblock you, on a few conditions. You must make sure you are aware of the guidelines as set out at WP:MOSIMAGE before adding further images. More importantly, you must commit to discussing disagreements with other users, and engage in discussions they start if the edits you make are contested. Most importantly, you must not engage in edit wars if others disagree with you. Since you have already implied, in your unblock request, you are prepared to abide by these conditions I shall unblock you. Be aware that further problems will lead to another block and you may not get a third chance. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 11:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I clearly stated above that one of the conditions of your unblock is that you refrain from making further edits to images until you have fully reviewed WP:MOSIMAGE, but within hours of my lifting the block you made these two edits sandwiching text between two images, contrary to the manual of style. I suggest you refrain from making any edits to images from now on as you are clearly incapable of understanding how to use them, and it is precisely this problem that got you blocked in the first place. It's best that you concentrate on the positive text edits you are clearly capable of making. If there are any further problems with image-related edits from you, I will reinstate the block without further warning. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 22:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Got it
This editor apparently is using an IP address to continue disruptive editing and edit warring while avoiding scrutiny. 179.197.190.162 AfricaTanz (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- God bless you, AfricaTanz! Vinícius18 (talk)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

:)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, and now resorting to sock puppetry to evade scrutiny at Pedro I of Brazil. I warned you when unblocking you last time that I would reinstate the block if your disruptive behaviour continued, but that hasn't made any difference. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 12:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinícius18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please explain what happened? I explained on your talk page, the IP entered is not my computer, I never would edit with an alternate account and my computer is forbidden to revert edits, so it would be impossible to "wars", I would not be stupid to repeat the mistake! I need an answer! Thank you! Vinícius18 (talk) 12:31, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I assume that you do not know what revert means. Here [1] is an edit you made, which contains a reversion. Computers cannot be set to prevent reversions. It is also obvious that the IP and you, who are making the same edits, are the same person.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinícius18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use an internet connection being shared per provider per router with 3 houses and say, I did NOT editions with an alternate account! I need to buy another computer with a new provider for believing in me? Vinícius18 (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think that maybe you need to reconsider whether your English is good enough to edit here, as the odd turns of phrase you use suggest to me that it is not your first language. Neither we nor you seem to be making much sense to each other. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.