User talk:Viraneth

Welcome!

Hello, Viraneth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like File:DoctorSteel.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ww2censor (talk) 05:05, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DoctorSteel.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:DoctorSteel.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 05:05, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Doctorsteel.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Doctorsteel.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 05:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Doctor Steel

I have nominated Doctor Steel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Steel (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:24, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Identity

I do have to say that the anonymous poster made a good case, and IMHO is probably right. There are copyright and trademark documents, the two artists have identical tastes in music, and placing a photo of each side-by-side, there are similarities in appearance.

However, this is Wikipedia, and speculation isn't encyclopedic. So until I see in print in a reliable publication, "Dr. Steel, who's real name is (redacted for privacy reasons) ..", it's staying as is. :) --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 23:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy Section

I'm not entirely sure that the bit about the Thinking Christian blog really belongs in the article, and have thus far shied away from including it. For several reasons: (1) It was, as you mentioned, largely ignored, and therefore not significant (bordering on trivial), (2) it might give people the impression that Dr. Steel is anti-Christian, perhaps fostering hostility between Christians and Dr. Steel's fanbase (or giving Christians the idea that they are not welcome as fans, both untrue), and (3) the writer of the blog himself admitted that the article was largely tongue-in-cheek. To me, adding that in detracts from the article rather than polishing it.
I also don't think a section of "negative backlash towards the Dr. Steel persona" is a good idea period, as I think we should be presenting the Doctor in a positive light, not a negative one. And if we did, then we would of necessity have to also include the very thing that got this article put on protected status in the first place, which of course for legal reasons can't be done.
I understand you want to polish the article and make it better - and I agree, I do too - but I don't think that is going in the right direction. Just my humble opinion, for what it's worth. --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 05:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help requested, AfD

The page for Dr. Steel's album, "Dr. Steel Read-Along", has been tagged for deletion. Please weigh in on the AfD discussion page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dr._Steel_Read-A-Long --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 01:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]