User talk:Virginia.serrani

Welcome!

Hello, Virginia.serrani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The centre of health design, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cynof Gavuf 12:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The centre of health design

A tag has been placed on The centre of health design requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cynof Gavuf 12:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Evidence-based design, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cynof Gavuf 12:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Evidence-based design, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. It would appear that you are in some way affiliated with Center of Health Design. Favonian (talk) 13:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

evidence based design

{{helpme}} I HAVE DELETED FOR AN ERROR THE MAINTENANCE TEMPLATE I WAS COPYING THE TEXT ON MY COMPUTER TO EDIT IT, BECAUSE I HAVE TO WORK OFFLINE BUT NOW I HAVE REPLACED THEM AT THE TOP OF THE ARTICLE

I HAVE A QUESTION: ARE THE MAINTENANCE TEMPLATE DYNAMIC OR STATIC? THEY ARE UPLOADED IF SOME CHANGES HAVE BENN MEADE OR THE REMAIN THERE AS A STORY OF THE ARTICLE?

AND, IS A WAY TO UNDERLINE IN WHICH PART OF THE DOCUMENT SOME THINGS DON'T WORK?

THANKS A LOT Virginia.serrani (talk) 13:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)virginia serrani[reply]

First, please do not communicate in all caps, it may be construed as shouting by some, and is difficult to read. The maintenance tags remain at the top of articles as long as nobody changes them; generally speaking, other editors will manually remove them once those issues have been addressed.

Regarding the article content itself: Think about it this way, if a casual reader wanted to know what Evidence-based design is about, and looked it up in a traditional encyclopedia, that article would completely baffle them. It reads very much like a brief of a research paper and not like an encyclopedia entry. Most of the bulleted lists are highly technical. Hopefully this will give you some ideas of how to rewrite the article. BlazerKnight (talk) 14:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]