User talk:Visionicseda
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Visionics, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.visionics.a.se/html/about.html. As a copyright violation, Visionics appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Visionics has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Visionics. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Visionics, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Spartaz 11:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Tags
[edit]It is not appropriate to remove speedy tags from your article. If you have permission to use the material there is a process to follow. Also the article reads like an advert and does not assert notability. Please see WP:NPOV and WP:CORP for policy/guidelines. If you need any held doing this please ask but as it stands your article risks being deleted unless you put the flaws right. --Spartaz 20:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 08:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EDWinXP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDWinXP (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bazj (talk) 11:40, 6 June 2015 (UTC)