Jump to content

User talk:Pipeperez01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Voixtek)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Voixtek, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Voixtek/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 23:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Voixtek/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 23:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Pipeperez01 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I want to be in compliance with the guidelines and to be able to contributeVoixtek (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

As you have been renamed, I have lifted the block. Please be careful; your edits so far have been inappropriate. Make sure you read and understand WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO before editing further. Yamla (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed

[edit]

Globally renamed Voixtek to Pipeperez01. Yunshui  07:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pipeperez01 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I dont want to do any advertising, I just want to colaborate and be part of wikipedia Pipeperez01 (talk) 14:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

For someone who doesn't want to do any advertising, you've done a lot of advertising... Yunshui  14:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were warned, twice, about WP:COI. Why did you chose to ignore those warnings? How would you abide by this policy if we unblocked you? Would you agree to avoid writing about Ron Anderson? What other subjects would you avoid? What would you write about instead? --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pipeperez01 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was testing the sandbox. now I understand the guidelines, I have no intention to make any advertising

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you explicitly refusing to answer the questions I asked you? If so, please say so. If not, please answer the questions I asked you. --Yamla (talk) 14:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pipeperez01 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have photos of my trips around the world and I want to share, and I want to participate the other ways too, and I wont do advertise Ron Anderson. was only creating an article that was not there. but I'll avoid that, then

Decline reason:

I agree your appeals are materially deceptive. Testing the sandbox with promotional content is still promotion. MER-C 16:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are unwilling to answer the questions posed, I have revoked your talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. They may choose to reinstate your talk page access even if they decline your request. --Yamla (talk) 15:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To the reviewing admin, note this user is attempting to mislead you when they say "was only creating an article that was not there". A simple google search shows a clear violation of WP:COI, which they have refused to address. --Yamla (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]