Jump to content

User talk:Volorik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Volorik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Hurricane111 15:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Shield of the Order of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Mercy

[edit]

Volorik, I was hoping you might tell me where you obtained this image. Since it appears that you are granting the copyright, I'm assuming that you created it, but where and how did you determine its authenticity. I've been attempting to research the "Mercy Shield", which was formerly used by the "Sisters of Mercy", as adopted by the Irish Catherine McAuley in 1831. However, they no longer use this standard, though many Catholic schools affiliated with this order use a seal that has incorporated its elements. Of the two images I have found that claim to be THE "Mercy Shield" one low-quality gif I have found, attributed to the Sisters of Mercy, describes itself as using a "Maltese Cross", when the image is clearly using a "Cross Formée". The other image, a scan of a black-and-white illustration scanned from an old Catholic encyclopedia, uses the "Formé Pattée", but also refers to this as a "Maltese Cross". Your image uses the "Cross Pattée". I'm trying to find what the the authentic cross form is for McAuley's "Mercy Shield", and if it is the same cross form as that used by the "Order of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Mercy". Actually, I can't even find a reference to when and how the "Fess gules with cross argent" was added to James of Aragon's "Or, four pallet gules". Any clue? -nathangsm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathangsm (talkcontribs) 13:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Small Scapular of the Order of Our Lady of Mercy.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Small Scapular of the Order of Our Lady of Mercy.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Small Scapular of the Order of Our Lady of Mercy.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 04:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:StPeterNolasco.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StPeterNolasco.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:D1ESCU20.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]