User talk:Vvvla

Welcome!

Hello, Vvvla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BIRTH INTERVAL

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article BIRTH INTERVAL, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC) Deletion policy says if you come across an article that is nothing more than a definition, see if there is information you can add that would be appropriate for an encyclopedia There was o hole, which I filled with definition. I may develop the article further or any body else. What is wrong with having the definition only for a time? Vvvla 08:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Kamran Abbasi has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Please do not use the edit summary "small addition" when you are adding clearly controversial information, especially when it is unsourced. EasyAsPai (talk) 01:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kamran Abbasi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rahio 1234 10:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you consider short factual note as vandalism?

Thank you Vvvla (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rochelle Walensky, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 10:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kamran Abbasi. Rahio 1234 10:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]