Jump to content

User talk:Vzaroor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional material in Tire-pressure monitoring system[edit]

I have removed some material you added to Tire-pressure monitoring system promoting PressurePro. I assume from your user name that you are Vanessa Zaroor, PressurePro’s Director of Marketing. While it is your job to promote your company and its products, Wikipedia is not the place to do it. I suggest you read and take to heart the Wikipedia articles on Conflict of interest and Spam (promoting outside interests on Wikipedia).

Although you have been editing here for several years now, all of your edits seem to be limited to this one topic, so you may not have realized that what you've been doing violates Neutral point of view, one of Wikipedia's three core content policies. You should read about that policy here before you edit Wikipedia any further.

Thanks.—Jim10701 (talk) 15:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Jim - Thank you. I didn't understand the conflict (as I assume that the Originals and Authorities in this market would be the best to write about it and provide information). The problem however, remains that the owners of another system, seem to be the only ones allowed to edit this page. In fact, though I continue to correct it to include the correct history of TPMS, including governmental studies, information on main competitors, etc, they continue to delete nearly everything other than the items about themselves. There needs to be policing on their side. This includes them trying to advocate for indirect TPMS solutions - even though they have been thoroughly discredited by not only the USDOT and transportation authorities, but also by those worldwide. My postings contain a full view of the market (as pointed out, also including information on competitors), but the fact remains that PressurePro remains that we have lead every advancement in our technology over the past 23 years, so there will be mentions of us.

So, my question becomes this, how can this be corrected to include a fair presentation and explanation of TPMS? I feel that many other items should be added, including very major advancements in TPMS, major historical markers (such as the addition of remote monitoring options, the ability to integrate with Telematics product, etc).