User talk:Walkingupright

Hello... I am a newbie and open to constructive criticism. Shelley 19:19, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Very good article

Hi Shelley, good job on the James Picard article. Well-written and appears to be well-sourced. I posted on your request for feedback page. All the best, Pianotech (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

Hi Shelley, You did loose a change in that edit conflict. No worries - I put it back. I know the system for resolving edit conflicts isn't great when you have done a complex edit yourself. For future reference, the best thing to do in that situation would have been to make the change (like you did) and then look at the article history. You can click on the "compare versions" button to see what changes were made while you were doing your edit (i.e. select the version before you saved your edit and the version before you started to make you edit (usually adjacent) and click on "compare versions"). Yaris678 (talk) 06:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips, Yaris. I looked at the comparison page for the change you fixed. I appreciate your input. Shelley 15:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of James Picard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Picard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Picard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tollens (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]