User talk:Wanderson Rossi

This is Wanderson Rossi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: RemNote (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RemNote and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 14:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wanderson Rossi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 14:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing article so quickly @Qcne! I wondered if the article I did was good enough for a first draft to be improved little by little. Apparently it wasn't 😅 (which is expected I guess, since it is my first time trying this, haha).

I will need to plan/schedule some other time to try to improve it soon, and I will try to read more of the guide and ask around at the teahouse if I have any questions. Thanks! Wanderson Rossi (talk) 18:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Wanderson Rossi. Well done on trying to make a new draft, it is a difficult task and please don't be discouraged by my declining!

My issue with your draft is that you haven't proven this piece of software meets the WP:NSOFTWARE test. Your latter three sources are primary, and your first three sources are average... but I felt they were just a smidgen too much like marketing to really count.

Finally, you should cut down your external links section to just one or two max.

Have a read of WP:NSOFTWARE and if you can find independent, reliable, secondary sources that prove this software meets that criteria, please do re-submit!

Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne (talk) 19:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:RemNote

Hello, Wanderson Rossi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RemNote".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]