User talk:Warren/0602

Please don't remove the copyvio template. Instead, write the replacement at a temporary subpage. The list of features in the new version was taken verbatim from the Microsoft presentation, and is therefore also a copyvio. - Sikon 16:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Double redirects to Internet Explorer[edit]

Hiya, thanks for reverting a few of my redirect "fixes" after Windows Internet Explorer was moved back to Internet Explorer. I took care of the other 15 or so. -- Daverocks (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vista-5270-desktop-classic.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Vista-5270-desktop-classic.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

because of microsoft copyright saying "Except for Microsoft product boot-up screens, opening screens, "splash screens," or screens from products that have not been commercially released (including beta versions), you may use screen shots" Manchot 13:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vista screenshots[edit]

Someone is claiming that the screenshots in the Windows Vista article are copyright infringements and has flagged them to be deleted. [1]

I voted to keep, glad you are e-mailing Microsoft about this issue. — Alex ^(T|C|E) 21:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I found this in the Connect .beta_program newsgroup: There is no confidentiality clause in the EULA for the current build (5270) and you may talk about the current build in public. — Alex ^(T|C|E) 21:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AIV vs VIP[edit]

Hi Warren/0602. I noticed you added an entry to Vandalism in Progress. That page is only for very specific cases, as described by the page's guidelines. Your alert would be better placed on Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV), where it will usually be processed within minutes. Many alerts that are incorrectly placed on Vandalism in Progress are never dealt with, simply because they become old before an administrator gets to them. Thanks for your efforts. :) --light darkness^(talk) 00:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]