User talk:We dislike Jeh

November 2015

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Jeh may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 02:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Jeh. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. General Ization ^Talk 02:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but I do not attack him/her, I just help him/her correct mistakes. We dislike Jeh (talk) 02:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because... (this is a normal page) --We dislike Jeh (talk) 02:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Janagewen, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

General Ization ^Talk 02:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked

Account blocked: clearly WP:NOTHERE to build the encyclopedia. -- The Anome (talk) 03:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. 2600:1:B11F:837C:5505:E109:B0E7:A5C3 (talk) 05:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]