User talk:WeathermanMN

Welcome!

Hello, WeathermanMN, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 黒い白い (KuroiShiroi) 22:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JNW (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. JNW (talk) 17:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simply put I almost want nothing to do with wikipedia anymore as I dont have time to keep unediting someones 'notability' edits. this is why college professors wont take wikipedia as a reliable source since its managed by a bunch of internet trolls. get a job!

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Actually, Wikipedia's integrity is compromised in part by those who edit from conflict of interest, and who introduce subjects without establishing notability. JNW (talk) 18:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

youre a pathetic piece of shit. you think ill lose sleep over this? go fuck yourself you pathetic asshole. and get a job, I hate paying for a bunch of losers who sit oin the internet all day to 'flag' an article. --WeathermanMN (talk) 18:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:SCCLOGOYES.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SCCLOGOYES.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Stanga

The article Michael Stanga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has insufficient verifiable references from reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TheWxPage.Com

The article TheWxPage.Com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The redirect target article has insufficient verifiable references from reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Michaelstanga.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Michaelstanga.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:SCCLOGOYES.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:SCCLOGOYES.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Michaelstanga.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Michaelstanga.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of St. Cloud State Storm Chase Club

An editor has nominated St. Cloud State Storm Chase Club, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Cloud State Storm Chase Club and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Michael Stanga

I have nominated Michael Stanga, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Stanga. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike | Talk 22:53, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]