User talk:Webkinz54

July 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Portland Thorns FC, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit that states "This is in no way violating any rules" is an empty statement. First, language is offensive. Second, you're using multiple accounts. Third, and probably the most enforceable, the information is completely unreferenced. Your actions have been reported. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your unsupported additions as were made to Seattle Reign FC . Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portland Thorns FC. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Webkinz54 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was improving the page, providing in depth detail about the two teams. Nothing wrong with what I did. Webkinz54 (talk) 09:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To you, it might have been an improvement. To us, it was vandalism. Peridon (talk) 10:47, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.