User talk:Wemjsjsmsmdmddm

I'm sorry 😞

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here so I can revert VandalismWemjsjsmsmdmddm (talk) 01:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 02:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here i will not build a encyclopedia Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (talk) 18:56, 13 September 2021 (UTC) I will not build a encyclopedia again I will never demge Wikipedia again[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, the block will keep you from damaging Wikipedia. If you have constructive contributions you want to make, please tell what those might be. 331dot (talk) 19:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Removing Vandalism Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (talk) 19:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here removing Vandalism

Decline reason:

No need. We'll leave you blocked so you stop harming the Wikipedia and that's better for the project. Yamla (talk) 19:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will sop Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (talk) 19:59, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will sopstop Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (talk) 19:59, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here so I can revert

Decline reason:

This doesn't even make sense. Plus, you're a sock, anyway. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wemjsjsmsmdmddm (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are not listening to us, I am removing access to this page. If your request is declined, that will leave you with WP:UTRS for further appeals. 331dot (talk) 22:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Peyton awx per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peyton awx. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]