User talk:Whammer79

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Alois P. Swoboda has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 12:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JNW (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hey whammer sources are verifiable from authoritative sources as referenced check them out:

Bob Hoffman,was a US Olympic Weightlifting Coach and the  Father Of World Weightlifting. Bob Hoffman's father was also  a Swoboda student [4].  Hoffman says, "So often I have said that my father had more muscles than I have seen since and we must remember that I am in the muscle business and that I have seen thousands of extraordinary physical specimens. He exercised incessantly and he could make most of any muscle group in his body feel like blocks of wood. I always believed that his exercises verged more on the tension type, rather than Functional Isometric Contraction,but there was a close similarity" Functional Isometric Contraction, by Bob Hoffman, 1962, page 202 [5]

[4] http://www.sandowplus.co.uk/Competition/Swoboda/swoboda.htm

[5]http://www.sandowplus.co.uk/Competition/Hoffman/fic/Functional%20Isometric%20Contraction —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowell58 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alois P. Swoboda. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Woody (talk) 23:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I keep changing the entries because someone else keeps posting information that cannont be verfied by any source- he keeps posting his own opinions or beliefs. Everything that I have posted can be found by searching the net. Whammer79 (talk) 02:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.sandowplus.co.uk/Competition/Swoboda/swoboda.htm Lowell58 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowell58 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/NE-CZECHS/2003-04/1049842528 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowell58 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Whammer79, Swoboda has you HOOKED. He's in control, even from the grave. P.S I know it's you Porker.Memberofthegospel (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whammer 79 is Dave Wamsley. He and a number of people on his site have a vendetta against Alois P. Swoboda because Swoboda's system is now being promoted by a publisher who refused to promote Wamsley's self defense system and the book of another member of Wamsley's forum. This is the worst kind of character assasination. Also that article quoted from Time is misquoted as it doesn't say that Swoboda was "fleecing" his students. [Lowell58]

Lowell58- you have no right to reveal my real name on this site. I have reported you and have asked to have you banned. Whammer79 (talk) 21:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Woody, Lowell58 is mentally unstable. He is posting lies about me on this page as well as my personal identiy. I want this man banned from Wikipedia. I believe he a danger and a threat to me. Whammer79 (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]