User talk:White Trillium

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User talk:X! has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Calmer Waters 23:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry it was an accident. --White Trillium (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, White Trillium! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 03:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Talkback

Hello, White Trillium. You have new messages at LiberalFascist's talk page.
Message added 04:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 04:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, White Trillium. You have new messages at LiberalFascist's talk page.
Message added 04:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 04:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, White Trillium. You have new messages at Fat&Happy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

00:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, White Trillium. You have new messages at Fat&Happy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

00:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, White Trillium. You have new messages at Fat&Happy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

05:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah

I wonder the same thing sometimes. :) Killiondude (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

pH

For PH, you changed my description of pH from "potentiometric hydrogen ion concentration" to "potential for hydrogen ion concentration". Isn't it more accurate to say potentiometric rather than potential for?Smallman12q (talk) 02:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Washington

The discussion on the talk page has a consensus to move since Washington State is not the primary use of Washington. Washington is rather ambiguous with at least three of those being significant uses. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:15, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What significant uses are you talking about? --White Trillium (talk) 05:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned in a SPI case

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DougsTech. Andewz111 (talk · contribs) (typo intended) 03:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

White Trillium (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deeply apologize for acting & behaving in a trollish way (i,e Doughtech). I would like the community to forgive me and I would like to continue to edit wikipedia if that's ok with you people. Thanks for your cooperation. You are not justified in blocking me and have no evidence.

Decline reason:

As noted here, this is instead a sock of User:South Bay and is still block evasion. Go back to that account or I will re-block with protection on this page. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.