User talk:WilhelmSchneider

Bass music discussion

Can you point me to the discussion that supported your move of what had been at Bass music? Thanks and best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course: Talk:UK_bass#nonsense_genre_naming. I'm sorry if you dissaprove of my actions. My suggestion really was undisputed on the talk page for 6 days, which is quite a fair time. And, just to add one more argument to the ones I gave on the talk page: If you look at the editing history, the original article "Bass music" was all about Miami bass, which is obviously another proof that the term "bass music" is ambiguous and shouldn't be used as if it weren't. Best regards, WilhelmSchneider (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't disapprove just didn't see it. Thanks for pointing it out to me. I missed it in the middle of the talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! :) WilhelmSchneider (talk) 20:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pile of charlie

Hey. What I meant was, the pile of coke pictured had no direct relevance to the text in that section. If it had said in the caption "pile of coke from disco bust circa 1975" or something of the like I would get why it was included but just to have a pic of some random charlie doesn't bring anything encyclopedic to the table and if you want to see a pile of coke the article or your dealer would probably be your best bet. Don't want to war over this either but also wanted you to understand my reason. Your thoughts? Rob van vee 16:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining, I see the good will! I do think it has encyclopedic value to have an image of it in the article, at least not less than any other image already there. A reader should not have to visit a drug dealer to see this. But as I said, I don't want to start a battle, so if you insist despite my arguments, I won't give you a hard time. WilhelmSchneider (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]