User talk:William A. P. D

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih (talk) 08:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

William A. P. D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Taiwan itself is not admitted as a country by the UN, and its flag isn't valid as a country.Also that the previous version before your edition,as I believe,is more objective. However if you intend me not to edit the more political terminologies I can stop editing them or I will request permission before I edit. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:55, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

William A. P. D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand and agree not to make major changes that disrupt the work of other contributors and make mindless changes of entries done by other contributors. As well as not to violate any wikipedia rules. William A. P. D (talk) 13:14, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You blanked the previous unblock decline, which you are not permitted to do. I assume you did so in order that the next reviewing administrator (me in this case) would not see your earlier totally inappropriate request. Your new request does not give me any hope at all that you can be trusted to edit neutrally and without causing further problems. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

William A. P. D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I insist my block should be reviewed for two reasons: first and foremost, my actions are done of good faith because as I said,I believe the precious version of the entry was a "better" version (obviousely not as I discovered later). but I didn't review the edits made correctly, causing it to be a wrong rollback. Second, I did not purposefully obstruct a wikipedia project, if you wish it rolled back and myself to not make such edits again you can simply message or email me about the issue, I intend not to make it a hard time for anyone. Thus, I hereby request my block to be removed. Thank you!William A. P. D (talk) 13:38, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am going to IAR here and save time for others. Reviewing administrators can take a look at my comment here. Further requests should go through Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. Alex Shih (talk) 23:48, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.