User talk:Windows XP Server

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Windows XP Server (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My username is not bad. It's just "Windows XP Server". What's inappropriate about that? Bbb23 doesn't know how to read usernames. Just let me change my username or read it.Windows XP Server (talk) 04:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your only edit was to create a vandalism article, so that's a reason to block you by itself. Aside from that, uou need to select a new user name, as this one suggests it's some kind of privileged Wikipedia IT account Nick-D (talk) 04:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Windows XP Server (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Totallyapro (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Please just give me a new username. I did nothing wrong. Windows XP Server (talk) 04:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You think attacking Wikipedia admins as "retarded" and "crappiest" is the way to get unblocked? And you have the nerve to claim you did nothing wrong when your only contribution was to create a draft article called "How many cows a wing has"? Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, let's talk. First off, I'm beginning to believe that Wikipedia has hired some of the most retarded moderators on planet earth. Can I please get a not retarded moderator so that we can have a sensible conversation?? Second, I don't think you understand. This was all an accident. This "vandalism" crap was not supposed to be on a new page, but instead, it was supposed to be in the sandbox thing. Me, being a new Wikipedia writer, did not realize that I was supposed to use the sandbox for testing things. Maybe you didn't already see this, but as moderators, your duty is not to make people's day worse, but instead to figure out what went wrong and how you can resolve the issue. In my opinion, the moderators I've talked to so far have done some of the CRAPPIEST jobs as moderators I've ever seen.

Windows XP Server (talk) 04:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC)An innocent person[reply]