User talk:Wine-in-ark

You can learn how to use Wikipedia by reading the policies. The administrators probably know more than me so how about asing them? And also, it would be less confusing when you leave the message on the bottom of my talk page, not the top. Han Amos 23:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many administrators here on Wikipedia. The few I know is User:Redvers, User:DragonflySixtyseven, User:Yamla, User:Pgk, and User:Ryulong. Many more can be found by clicking here. Han Amos 01:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Just to tell you that my name is really Amos Han, but I inverted my name when creating an account. Han Amos 01:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:References

Hi! Have you visited WP:CITE and WP:ATT? The latter page, especially, seems to apply to your case. I would recommend referencing a third party source (e.g. another public and well-known website, or books), instead of the interal web, as much as possible.

Welcome to Wikipedia and have a great day! Poor Yorick 06:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Regarding anon sources and blog replies, that would be considered original research and thus unreliable. See WP:ATT#Reliable Sources and the categories of questionable and self-published sources; the anon / blog replies would probably go under both categories.

Again, if you can find a credible secondary source that has synthesized the primary source stuff, then you probably can cite that. Again, WP:ATT tells you what is credible and what isn't.

vandalquiroz

Check out User:Rickquiroz's fun and games at Ouspensky and Gurdjieff.

Then can his ass. =)Yeago 20:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

When reporting a user, go to WP:AIV. Then click on the Edit button on the User-reported section. When reporting an IP address, put {{IPvandal|00.00.00.00}} (this is just an example). When reporting a username, put {{Vandal|Username}}. Leave me a message when you still don't get how to report a user. Han Amos 19:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fellowship of Friends

An editor has nominated Fellowship of Friends, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fellowship of Friends and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remember me?

I am the one who gave you advice on the Fellowship of Friends article. I am going to let you know that I am going to make my 1000th edit soon (this is my 998th edit). Amos Han ^Talk 02:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi Jason, Veronicapoe is starting to behave like a vandal to me. She makes highly controversial edits, she undoes other editor's edits, she doesn't follow our advice on the Talk page. I noticed you got rid of Vandalquiroz. Any suggestion? Mario Fantoni 05:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The plot thickens

Hi Jason, I left you 2 messages in the FoF Talk page asking if you are a Wikipedia Administrator. Somebody, may be you, with the IP address 148.78.41.150 replied saying that you aren't. Was that really you? I am asking because an Administrator denounced sockpupeteering on the Talk page (see my recent "sockpupeteering" message). Please reply. Thank you. Mario Fantoni 02:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mario, 1) no I'm not an administrator and 2) yes, I really left that message but at the time I didn't notice that I wasn't logged in. Wine-in-ark 22:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fof

Don't bother editing the draft anymore, as the initial article is getting edited. (see talk) Aeuio 21:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copious tags

In the future, please refrain from using several tags in the same section. It is disruptive, and just plain ugly. Please use {{POV-section}} for such instances in the future. Cheers! Vassyana 17:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Artemis lane.jpg

The file File:Artemis lane.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:FellowshipGatehouse.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]