User talk:WomenOlympians

February 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "WomenOlympians", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it suggests this is a group or shared account. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Inga Thompson, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 23:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Funny. Putting up links to sourced articles in the face of vandalism by your activists constitutes a block. I'll take note of the lack of being objective displayed by Wiki and pushing your agenda. WomenOlympians (talk) 23:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, the last edit before you were blocked was to remove a source. —C.Fred (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure to what you're referring WomenOlympians (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They/Them/C.Fred You're making my point perfectly! WomenOlympians (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]