User talk:Xambia

Image tagging for Image:Jamesstunt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamesstunt.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of James Stunt

I've nominated James Stunt, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that James Stunt satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Stunt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of James Stunt during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 23:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jamesstunt1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jamesstunt1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Resolute 04:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Resolute 04:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have marked this for "speedy" deletion, as it seems almost certain to be a blatant copyvio. If it isn't, you should be able to get a copy without a watermark *and* explain your relationship to Getty Images. Fourohfour 16:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Followup: Some admin has removed it now. 18:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)