User talk:Yale s

Welcome!

Hello, Yale s, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 05:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have any more links?

Email them to me. Use the E-mail this user link in the toolbox in the lower left of my talk page. (below the search box) to send me an email. I periodically remove wayne's SEO spam. Kevin_b_er 05:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Universe Daily

Hi Yale, please keep New additions and Blacklisted separate in future until meta has processed your request. Inserting new sites straight into the blacklisted section makes it almost impossible to search for Wayne's latest accounts. Thanks. -- Netsnipe ► 05:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signing

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!

PS: You can submit Wayne's new links to meta:Talk:Spam_blacklist yourself. Just link back to en:Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Universe Daily in your report so that the blacklist admins (who are a separate role from those on the English Wikipedia) know who you're referring to. -- Netsnipe ► 05:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne Username

Yales as far as I know http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wolfkeeper is a puppet for Wayne, as you can see he is quite prolific and even well regarded, though this tends to change when he gets into a POV debate :(

Regards Quarkstorm 17:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quark... Howyadoin!

What makes you think that Wolfkeeper is Smith? Every posting by Smith on wikipedia is simple Linkspam and/or deranged obscene ravings and vandalizations. Many of those posts by Wolfkeeper are subjects that smith has no interest in. Plus the technical level is WAY WAY WAY too high for him. He has not the slightest technical or scientific knowledge whatsoever - he just makes stuff up out of thin air. This is the kind of stuff he posts: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/121.222.15.51 Can you give me an example of his postings that you think are smith-like? Yale s 18:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't prove anything on Wolfkeeper except that he has some familiar areas of interest. It does seem to be a more restrained user who does occassionally get into arguments/revert wars thhough not perhaps on the scale we're used to from Wayne. Wayne has, however been active with the following IP 64.109.209.49 in replacing a Nuclear Propulsion article with "Jakob Sukksss" Quarkstorm (talk) 14:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quark, that IP is American. Wayne uses Telstra in Australia.Yale s (talk) 07:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

I have briefly semi-protected your page following the personal attacks earlier today. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. this

Um, which linkspam? There's only one external link and that's relevant to what the writing was about. Also, you said that you reverted it but reverted it to what? There was a redirect originally so at least it should be restored to that but also per WP:BLANK it is generally practice not to leave pages empty. -- Menti sock 10:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That link is to a fake site.

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse/Universe_Daily

Note the "Instructions" for any contributions made by that vandal:

"Block on sight and revert; always disable e-mail

Take a look at the vandal's talk page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Croclover

Bye bye Suckers! Time to throw you guys another bone. Seeing as you haven't even figured out my goals here. Makes it less boring beating you all the time. The only reason I told Yales at my website about what was happening here is that its too late for him to make any difference. Try googling 'Bindi Irwin' and you'll understand. Wikipedia doesn't get all that many hits to its external links on pages but is great for webcrawlers. I currently have about 340 links listed on your pages. When they get to the top of search engines I redirect them. Get it? Ta ta you morons! Croclover 02:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I did err in accidentally removing the REDIRECT. Thanks for repairing it. Yale s (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I was thinking it was something like that after noticing a redirect of the domain. Thanks for the clarification. -- Menti sock 16:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]