User talk:Yankees1987

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Antonio Banderas has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alfie ↑↓© 02:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Antonio Banderas constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. WAYNEOLAJUWON 02:14, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not intentionally introduce incorrect information to pages, as you did with this edit to Antonio Banderas. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alfie ↑↓© 02:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Antonio Banderas. WAYNEOLAJUWON 02:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Please do not add categories to biography articles unless you have a WP:reliable source to support the category, as you have done on the Antonio Banderas and Sara Carbonero. Also please do not remove properly referenced information without stating a valid reason. Repeatedly doing so, as you have been doing with the Antonio Banderas article, will result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 04:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:10, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are ASKING for a second block

This is your only warning. Stop adding categories that are not sourced in the article.
On Wikipedia a person must self-identify with a particular denomination before being categorized; and the only way to know if they self-identify is a source indicating that the person is currently Catholic (or Baptist, or atheist, or whatever). That standard is frequently violated because many people think they can put anything about a person's religous beliefs in an article without reliable sourcing. If someone grows up an atheist but is now a Christian (see William J. Murray), do we put that person in the "Atheists" category?" MANY people grow up in a particular denomination (or lack thereof in Murray's case) but do not end up claiming that perspective when they are adults. This is a simple matter of following one of the very cornerstones of Wikipedia: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth." Macaulay Culkin and Gwen Stefani may very well be a Catholic right now, but the article doesn't state that. And remember, the responsibility for sourcing is on the person who adds or restores information. If you add such a category to a Wikipedia article again without proper sourcing, you will be blocked from editing. Cresix (talk) 02:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for repeated violation of WP:BLPCAT. WP:BLP is something we take very seriously on Wikipedia, as real people are involved. You have previously been warned and blocked about this, and any further violation once this block expires may result in you being blocked indefinitely.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 06:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]