User talk:Yehudamalul

Welcome!

Hello, Yehudamalul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Laurinavicius (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Gustilo open fracture classification, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jeepday (talk) 15:30, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have a similar concern about your addition to pneumothorax. Some of the contributions are directly contradicted by another source (Leigh-Smith, which is devoted entirely to traumatic pneumothorax). I'd be most grateful if you could have a look at the guidelines quoted by Jeepday, and have a close read of WP:MEDRS. The latter is very important for medical articles. JFW | T@lk 17:55, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages

I reverted your edit to Pneumothorax, as the article is not the place to add your comments. Each article has an associated talk page - in this case Talk:Pneumothorax. If you want to discuss edits to that article, its talk page is the best place for that. --RexxS (talk) 14:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your edits, I justified my removal an in edit summary. The revert and explanation can be seen here. The information cited to Saboston (a board review book, rather than a textbook) contradicts a principal source in the article. JFW | T@lk 16:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Galactosemia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Petiatil^»Talk 11:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]