User talk:Yvette Worth Sanson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Yvette Worth Sanson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Laminated glass. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FiberTech (talk) 13:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Information icon

Hello Yvette Worth Sanson. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yvette Worth Sanson. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yvette Worth Sanson|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 21:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Novadata TAB Ltd has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a company, corporation or organization that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SmartSE (talk) 21:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Novadata deletion[edit]

Hi SmartSE, sorry if I'm getting this wrong. It's taken me a while to work out how to answer a message - I'm not exactly finding Wikipedia very user-friendly. Sorry to have caused any offense. Feels like Wiki discourages new users by making information hard to find, I didn't see any of the stuff you mentioned when I joined. I don't suppose there are that many 60 year old female novice users out there. Shame really, as it would be more an encyclopaedia of the people if we were accommodated.

Yvette Worth Sanson (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Braintree[edit]

Hi Yvette. I noticed you were one of the last people to usefully contribute to Braintree, Essex, but it sounds like you have been discouraged from editing Wikipedia by a bad experience on another article. I got to the Braintree article as a reader (looking into family history), but I am an experienced editor on Australian places and other topics. I'd like to encourage you to have another go, and invite you to consider if you can improve the Braintree article. if you need help, please contact me via my talk page and I will try to assist. Being your age and gender should not be an impediment, and we need more people of all kinds to have broad coverage. We know we are short of women, both as editors and as biographical topics. Thank you for anything you can do. --Scott Davis Talk 12:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]