User talk:Yvo2013
A new start?
[edit]Hi Yvo2013,
Thank you for your help in improving Wikipedia. The gay marriage issue is an important and controversial subject, and I think many MP's articles will benefit from adding information on this issue. However, when you add very brief information from a pressure group (Stonewall) to many articles, it can appear as if you are promoting just one cause, and not keeping the article neutral. Wikipedia must always be neutral.
Would you mind looking at how the Stephen Williams (politician) article has changed? I took the helpful information in your edits, and (I think) added to them by showing how:
- organisations other than Stonewall have noted Williams' position on gay rights issues
- Williams' takes particular interest in gay rights issues, above and beyond the average MP, and reliable sources (e.g. Newspapers) say so
I hope you think that makes the Stephen Williams page more balanced. (Although it needs a lot more work!) So...before you add the same link to other MP's pages, would you be able to find other references to prove why Stonewall's ratings are notable for that MP?
If these things can happen I think your future edits will not be removed.
PS: Please read WP:TPG. It's always better to talk through a discussion instead of ignoring it, and blanking your talk page of all discussion is not going to help this dispute be fixed. Also, it's very bad form to remove content from other people's talkpages. Please don't do that.
Again, thanks for your contributions. Many of the MP's articles need lots of work, and you seem knowledgeable about politics and willing to invest the time to improve them. I think you have a bright future on Wikipedia! PhilMacD (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
March 2013
[edit]
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Viewfinder. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PhilMacD (talk) 15:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with that - and I also agree with PM's other contributions to this page. Viewfinder (talk) 23:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)